• Guidelines for Peer Reviewers
• Terms & Conditions
• Privacy Policy
• Editorial Board
• Join Editorial Board
• Publish with Us

All manuscripts submitted to Newredmars Education journals undergo a single-blind peer review process. An outline of this process is available through the peer review schematic.

Peer reviewers are expected to provide an objective and critical evaluation of the manuscript. Reviewers must recommend a rank between 1 to 9, where 1 indicates an excellent manuscript and 9 indicates rejection due to major flaws.

Reviewers should indicate whether the manuscript requires correction in English grammar, punctuation, or spelling. Each review report must include a clear recommendation supported by reasons.

If revisions are required, reviewers should provide constructive suggestions to improve the manuscript. If the work is unsuitable for publication and unlikely to improve, rejection should be recommended.

Reviewers must assess whether the manuscript aligns with the aims and scope of the journal, which are available on each journal’s homepage.

Reviewers are advised to adhere to the COPE Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers before accepting and throughout the review process.

Deadline for Peer Review

Reviews must be submitted through the official Newredmars Education website link. The invitation email specifies the deadline for submission of reviewer comments.

Conflicts of Interest

Reviewers must not accept a peer-review assignment if they are unable to conduct the review objectively or have any conflicts of interest.